Freedom Beagle crest Freedom Beagle crest Freedom Beagle Off the leash, on the story.

Grievance Audit52

Grievance Audit No. 3: They Warned Against Standing Armies. In 2025, the Words Went Back to Court.

FREEDOM BEAGLE STAFF · JULY 19, 2026

The Grievance Audit holds the modern federal record up against the twenty-seven grievances the Declaration of Independence leveled at King George III in 1776. Same method every time: quote the grievance, quote what the Founders built to fix it, lay out today’s record with citations. Terms of art are defined per Black’s Law Dictionary. Reporting on documents, not legal advice.

The grievance

“He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.” — Declaration of Independence, para. 13 (1776)

Read the two conditions, because they are the whole point. Not armies in wartime — armies in times of peace. Not armies raised by the people’s representatives — armies kept without the Consent of our legislatures. The colonists had watched a permanent professional force garrisoned in their towns, answerable to a distant executive, and they concluded that a standing army loose from legislative control was not a defense of liberty but a standing threat to it. This was not a fringe view. It was the consensus of the founding generation.

What the Founders built

They did not ban armies. They chained them to the elected legislature and starved them of permanence:

  • U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 12: Congress has power “To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years.” That two-year leash was deliberate — an army that must return to Congress for its funding every two years cannot easily become the private instrument of an executive.
  • U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 11: the power “To declare War” belongs to Congress. The branch that raises the army does not get to launch it on its own say-so.
  • U.S. Const. amend. III: no soldier shall be quartered in any house in peacetime without the owner’s consent — the most direct textual descendant of the grievance, and the least-litigated provision in the Bill of Rights, because for two centuries the principle mostly held.
  • U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 1: the President is Commander in Chief — civilian control of the military, but civilian control that answers to the ballot.

The architecture is a leash held by the elected branch: Congress raises the force, funds it in two-year increments, and alone declares the wars it fights.

The terms, per Black’s

  • Standing army — Black’s Law Dictionary (12th ed. 2024): a permanent army of paid soldiers, maintained in both peace and war.
  • Posse comitatus — per Black’s, the power of a sheriff or other official to summon able-bodied persons to assist in keeping the peace; the phrase now attaches chiefly to the federal statute barring the military from that role.
  • Martial law — per Black’s, the law imposed on a domestic population by military authorities in an emergency, displacing ordinary civilian government and courts.
  • Insurrection — per Black’s, an act or instance of revolting against civil authority or an established government; the statutory trigger for the narrow exception that lets federal troops act at home.

The record today

We keep a permanent standing army — a large one — as a settled fact of life. As of March 2025, the United States maintained roughly 1.32 million active-duty service members, according to Department of Defense figures reported by USAFacts and the Pew Research Center. Whatever one thinks of that number, note only this for the audit: a permanent professional army of over a million, garrisoned in peacetime, is precisely the institution the grievance named. The founding generation would have found its mere existence remarkable. We find it unremarkable. That shift is the story.

The two-year leash still exists — but it has never once pulled the army back. Congress does re-authorize military spending every year through the National Defense Authorization Act, so the letter of the two-year appropriations rule is honored. But the check the Founders imagined — a legislature that might decline to fund a standing army — has never, in the modern era, been exercised to that end. The leash is intact and has never been tightened.

And Congress has not declared war since 1942 — while the fighting never stopped. The last formal declarations of war under Article I were in June 1942, against Hungary, Bulgaria, and Romania (the last against a major power, Japan, came in December 1941). Since then: Korea, Vietnam, Grenada, Panama, the Gulf War, Afghanistan, Iraq, and a two-decade global campaign under the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force — none of them a declared war. Congress passed the War Powers Resolution, 50 U.S.C. §§ 1541–1548, in 1973 to reclaim its role; presidents of both parties have treated it as advisory. The power the Constitution assigned to the legislature migrated, war by war, to the executive — and this migration is thoroughly bipartisan. No single administration built it; a long line of them did.

The wall against domestic troops held for a century — and in 2025 it was tested coast to coast. The Posse Comitatus Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1385, generally makes it a crime to use the federal armed forces “to execute the laws” — that is, for domestic policing — except where the Constitution or Congress expressly allows. The main express exception is the Insurrection Act, 10 U.S.C. §§ 251–255. In 2025 those provisions moved from the law-school seminar to the front page. Beginning June 7, 2025, the administration invoked 10 U.S.C. § 12406 to federalize National Guard units and deploy them into American cities over the objections of the states’ own governors — roughly 4,000 California Guard members into Los Angeles, followed by deployments touching Oregon and Illinois. The courts pushed back, hard and across the ideological spectrum:

  • In August 2025, a federal district court ruled after trial that the Los Angeles deployment violated the Posse Comitatus Act.
  • In December 2025, the Supreme Court, 6–3, blocked a parallel deployment to Chicago, writing that “the Government has failed to identify a source of authority that would allow the military to execute the laws in Illinois.”
  • Also in December 2025, a federal court ordered the federalization of California’s Guard to end; the state’s governor characterized the ruling in the Founders’ own idiom — that the government could not keep “a standing army” on the state’s streets.

Two hundred and forty-nine years after the grievance was written, a federal court was once again being asked whether the executive could station soldiers among the people against the wishes of their elected government. The words came back verbatim.

Meanwhile the tools of the standing army have flowed to civilian police. Through the Department of Defense’s 1033 program, 10 U.S.C. § 2576a, the military has transferred surplus equipment — rifles, armored vehicles, and more — to local law enforcement. Tallies of the original acquisition value run to roughly $7 billion in gear routed to some 8,000-plus agencies since the 1990s, according to the program’s overseeing office and analyses by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and the ACLU. The army did not need to march into the town square. Some of its hardware was already parked at the local police department.

By the numbers

  • ~1.32 million — active-duty U.S. service members, March 2025 (DoD, via USAFacts / Pew Research Center)
  • 1942 — last year Congress formally declared war (U.S. Senate historical records)
  • 50+ years — since the War Powers Resolution (1973) tried to reclaim Congress’s war role; treated as advisory by presidents of both parties
  • 18 U.S.C. § 1385 — Posse Comitatus Act, barring the military from domestic law enforcement absent express authority
  • 10 U.S.C. §§ 251–255 — Insurrection Act, the narrow exception
  • 2025 — year of coast-to-coast litigation over federalized Guard troops in U.S. cities, culminating in a 6–3 Supreme Court order blocking the Chicago deployment
  • ~$7 billion / 8,000+ agencies — value of military surplus routed to local police under the 1033 program since the 1990s (program office; CREW; ACLU)

The counterweight

State the strongest opposing case in full. A permanent standing army is, in the modern world, a practical necessity, not a tyrant’s luxury — the eighteenth-century militia model cannot defend a continental nation against modern threats, and every serious state maintains a professional force. The army is funded by Congress, whose members are elected, and civilian control of the military — an elected Commander in Chief, a Senate-confirmed leadership, congressional appropriations — is real and, by world-historical standards, remarkably robust. The Insurrection Act deployments that do occur are statutorily authorized: Congress wrote that law, and using it is not lawlessness. The expansion of executive war power is genuinely bipartisan, which cuts against reading it as any one faction’s plot. And most important for this audit: in 2025 the constitutional structure worked. Governors sued. Trial courts held. A cross-ideological Supreme Court majority told the executive it had failed to find any authority for troops in Illinois. The leash frayed — and then the courts re-gripped it in public, on the record. A system that catches and reverses the overreach is not the system the grievance described. It is, arguably, the system the Founders built doing exactly its job.

All true. And all of it sits atop the fact the audit exists to name: the thing the Founders treated as a standing danger — a large permanent army in peacetime, and an executive increasingly able to move it and make war without the legislature — is now the baseline, contested only at its most extreme edges, and defended primarily on the ground that it is necessary and, so far, checked.

The audit

The 1776 grievance was a standing army in peacetime, beyond the reach of the people’s legislature. The 2026 record is a permanent 1.3-million-strong military, a war power that has drifted from Congress to the presidency across eighty years and both parties, a domestic-deployment wall that had to be re-defended in court in 2025 up to a 6–3 Supreme Court, and military hardware distributed by the billions to the police on Main Street. The Founders’ leash — raise the army, fund it in two-year bites, and let only Congress declare its wars — is still written in the document. In practice it has been stretched to its farthest length, and it took a coast-to-coast legal fight to keep it from snapping.

Inter arma enim silent leges — in times of war, the law falls silent. The whole American design was a wager that it need not.

Next in the series: “He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.”

Sources: